<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fusion in 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/</link>
	<description>A PeopleSoft Tips and Tricks Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidhaimes</title>
		<link>http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davidhaimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graham

I&#039;m not sure that your comment on Oracle&#039;s track record in Apps can be justified.  Exactly what data are you basing your assertion on ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that your comment on Oracle&#8217;s track record in Apps can be justified.  Exactly what data are you basing your assertion on ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle does not have a great track record for building *good&quot; business applications.  Database technology - yes..... Apps... No.

Perhaps the reason why so many people find it necessary to &quot;discuss&quot; what Fusion Apps is (and what it isn&#039;t) is because the Vendor is not  communicating effectively.  I should not need to go to a journalists website to hear about my software or even to a user group site!   

Why do we have to spend time analysing, interpreting and speculating on what our Vendor is or isn&#039;t saying?

I was also at the UKOUG conference and heard Jesper. I too left with the impression that the full ERP suite GA is unlikely to be in 2008.

Graham

&quot;It&#039;s all character building.... and.... we&#039;re nothing without character&quot; (my Dad 1971)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle does not have a great track record for building *good&#8221; business applications.  Database technology &#8211; yes&#8230;.. Apps&#8230; No.</p>
<p>Perhaps the reason why so many people find it necessary to &#8220;discuss&#8221; what Fusion Apps is (and what it isn&#8217;t) is because the Vendor is not  communicating effectively.  I should not need to go to a journalists website to hear about my software or even to a user group site!   </p>
<p>Why do we have to spend time analysing, interpreting and speculating on what our Vendor is or isn&#8217;t saying?</p>
<p>I was also at the UKOUG conference and heard Jesper. I too left with the impression that the full ERP suite GA is unlikely to be in 2008.</p>
<p>Graham</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all character building&#8230;. and&#8230;. we&#8217;re nothing without character&#8221; (my Dad 1971)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeopleSoft Tipster</title>
		<link>http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PeopleSoft Tipster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for stopping by Floyd, you make some excellent points too.  It seems that you have the contacts to provide facts that the article author either didn&#039;t have or didn&#039;t research.

I do have one comment to add though.  Jesper Andersen (Oracle&#039;s SVP Apps Strategy for those that don&#039;t know) said at the UK OUG that there would be some kind of beta for the Fusion suite in 2008, followed by a limited release (to maybe 50 customers), and only then General Availability.  He chose his words carefully (and even admitted to being a bit of a politician to avoid giving too much away) so didn&#039;t give any dates, but you can&#039;t tell me you still believe the 3rd phase (GA) is going to be in 2008?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by Floyd, you make some excellent points too.  It seems that you have the contacts to provide facts that the article author either didn&#8217;t have or didn&#8217;t research.</p>
<p>I do have one comment to add though.  Jesper Andersen (Oracle&#8217;s SVP Apps Strategy for those that don&#8217;t know) said at the UK OUG that there would be some kind of beta for the Fusion suite in 2008, followed by a limited release (to maybe 50 customers), and only then General Availability.  He chose his words carefully (and even admitted to being a bit of a politician to avoid giving too much away) so didn&#8217;t give any dates, but you can&#8217;t tell me you still believe the 3rd phase (GA) is going to be in 2008?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dont worry. Fusion will be a success. The above is all ## profanity removed ##.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont worry. Fusion will be a success. The above is all ## profanity removed ##.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Floyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesofttipster.com/2007/12/12/fusion-in-2009/#comment-575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t think Fusion Apps are slipping into 2009.  See http://orclville.blogspot.com/2007/12/dont-try-to-describe-ocean-if-youve.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think Fusion Apps are slipping into 2009.  See <a href="http://orclville.blogspot.com/2007/12/dont-try-to-describe-ocean-if-youve.html" rel="nofollow">http://orclville.blogspot.com/2007/12/dont-try-to-describe-ocean-if-youve.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

